When Was John Written?

Donor Portal Login. Search verses, phrases, and topics e. John , Jesus faith love. Other Searches. Blue Letter Bible offers several daily devotional readings in order to help you refocus on Christ and the Gospel of His peace and righteousness. Recognizing the value of consistent reflection upon the Word of God in order to refocus one’s mind and heart upon Christ and His Gospel of peace, we provide several reading plans designed to cover the entire Bible in a year. The Apostle John is usually credited with the authorship of the fourth Gospel. First of all, the author had to have been an eyewitness of the ministry of Jesus ; ;

John, gospel of

Please help support the mission of New Advent and get the full contents of this website as an instant download. This subject will be considered under the following heads: I. Contents and Scheme of the Gospel; II. Distinctive Peculiarities; III.

Unlike the other gospels, John the apostle is never named in the Gospel of John, though his name seems to be deliberately self-obscured by calling himself “.

The writings of John are often assigned the latest dates of all New Testament literature, with some secular scholars placing them well into the second century A. Of course John the son of Zebedee, the disciple of Jesus, could not have lived long enough to write anything much into the second century, so in this case establishing a date of writing should first involve establishing that John was in fact the author.

It would perhaps be best to first establish the case that the same author is responsible for all the books associated with John. The New Testament books of John, 1 John, 2 John, 3 John and Revelation are sometimes called the Johannine literature and are traditionally assigned to John the son of Zebedee, one of the twelve disciples of Jesus. Still, there is reason to believe that the traditional understanding here is correct. The identification of John the son of Zebedee as the author of this material is dependent on a combination of the writings of early church fathers and indirect evidence within these books.

Holding John the son of Zebedee to be the author of Revelation are the second century church fathers Justin Martyr and Irenaeus, along with third century fathers Clement of Alexandria, Tertullian of Carthage, Origen of Alexandria, and Hippolytus of Rome. However, Papius identifies a separate John as the writer of the letters of John and Revelation, so there is some variance in early tradition as to authorship of the Johannine letters.

Unlike the other gospels, John the apostle is never named in the Gospel of John, though his name seems to be deliberately self-obscured by calling himself “another disciple” or the “disciple that Jesus loved” John , , , , , , , The “we” in John indicates that the author, along with the other apostles, were eyewitnesses of Jesus.

Introductions: John

The Gospel according to John is quite different in character from the three synoptic gospels. It is highly literary and symbolic. It does not follow the same order or reproduce the same stories as the synoptic gospels. To a much greater degree, it is the product of a developed theological reflection and grows out of a different circle and tradition.

The Gospel of John begins with a magnificent prologue, which states many of gospel and arrangement in its present form probably dates from between A.D.

This New Testament text is generally believed to have been written after the other gospels Mark, Matthew and Luke. I think there are several good reasons to accept this claim, given the historical and textual evidence:. There are good reasons to accept the claim that John wrote his account after the other gospel accounts had already been written. But does this mean that it was written late in history?

If this is true, the gospel could not have been written by the Apostle John or anyone else who actually witnessed the life and ministry of Jesus of Nazareth. I also believe this gospel was written early; within the lifetime of people who witnessed the events it records. This is important, because the early dating of the Gospels helps to establish their reliability as eyewitness accounts.

Here is a very brief summary of the evidence establishing the early dating of the Gospel of John:. In John Chapter 21, we find the following passage vs :. In this passage, John appears to be aware of the fact that Peter was already dead Peter was martyred in approximately 64AD , as he felt the need to further explain this statement of Jesus. This book teaches readers ten principles of cold-case investigations and applies these strategies to investigate the claims of the gospel authors.

An Introduction to the Gospels

Three anonymous books from among the general epistles in the NT that traditionally have been ascribed to John, the son of Zebedee. Many distinctives set these three epistles apart from the other letters of the NT, and at the same time draw them together. Earliest Gnostic tendencies. Many writers have concluded that incipient Gnosticism not identifiable historically until the 2nd cent.

An Introduction Porter and Ong. 1. Dating Sources and Traditions of Johns Gospel. 9. The Date of Johns Gospel and Its Origins Porter.

First of all, I apologize—I did not mean to misrepresent you. Also, let me express my great respect for your expertise in the area of NT Greek grammar. Your Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics and its abridgment have been indispensable resources in my writing and teaching. In the matter at hand, too, I agree that discussions have too often proceeded without scholars adducing actual evidence, and, as you noted, this has been my desire in interacting with your publications on John in my BECNT commentary.

I will not unnecessarily prolong further discussion at this point, since it is obvious that you and I continue to disagree on the matter. I will limit myself to three brief points in this my final response for the time being. We both agree that other factors must be considered as well, though you do feel more strongly about John favoring a pre-AD 70 date. I believe there is an important difference in these two cases, however. To be sure, the majority is not always, or necessarily, right, but it should give the wise, careful scholar pause when the vast majority of those sharing his overall theological convictions come to different conclusions on a given issue.

This was, and continues to be, my point.


One of the ways in which this conviction is expressed in the Gospel is through an extraordinary series of claims made by Jesus, all of which reveal different aspects of the divine reality and the relationship of that divine reality to human beings. Articles from this site will be referred to several times in this module. The only cautionary comment to be made is that some of the student projects are not as accurate and insightful as the ones written or organised by Just himself.

I. Author: The Apostle John, Son Of Zebedee · II. Date: Probably Between AD 85 And 95 · III. Place Of Origin And Destination: Ephesus To.

The supposition that the author was one and the same with the beloved disciple is often advanced as a means of insuring that the evangelist did witness Jesus’ ministry. Two other passages are advanced as evidence of the same – and But both falter under close scrutiny. Neither of these passages, therefore, persuades many Johannine scholars that the author claims eyewitness status.

There is a case to be made that John, the son of Zebedee, had already died long before the Gospel of John came to be written. It is worth noting for its own sake, even though the “beloved disciple” need not be identified with John, the son of Zebedee. In his ninth century Chronicle in the codex Coislinianus, George Hartolos says, “[John] was worth of martyrdom. Morton Enslin observes Christian Beginnings , pp.

None the less, this Marcan passage itself affords solid ground. No reasonable interpretation of these words can deny the high probability that by the time these words were written [ca.

Gospel of St. John

Recent observations have shown that regular many Christians even ordinary Church goers have their favourite scripture quotations of the New Testament in the Gospel of John. It is instructive that this Gospel does not identify its author as John. Meanwhile, questions surrounding the authorship of the Fourth Gospel which critical scholars of generations past thought were settled have recently gained keen attention of scholars in the recent time.

However, this research calls attention to re-entrench past and current trends in regards to the issue at hand as well as analyze the varying reasons for different opinions in other to establish a viable stance. The Gospels are the four canonized books of the New Testament which explicitly presents the life and ministry account of Jesus Christ. Far beyond that, several scholars in the contemporary time see Church tradition regarding the authorship as being probable.

The Gospel of Thomas and St John’s Gospel – Volume 9 Issue 2 – R. E. Brown. This Gnostic work, parts of which may date back to the second century, has a.

When the New Testament was written is a significant issue, as one assembles the overall argument for Christianity. Confidence in the historical accuracy of these documents depends partly on whether they were written by eyewitnesses and contemporaries to the events described, as the Bible claims. Negative critical scholars strengthen their own views as they separate the actual events from the writings by as much time as possible.

For this reason radical scholars argue for late first century, and if possible second century, dates for the autographs [original manuscripts]. By these dates they argue that the New Testament documents, especially the Gospels, contain mythology. The writers created the events contained, rather than reported them. The Gospel of Luke was written by the same author as the Acts of the Apostles, who refers to Luke as the ‘former account’ of ‘all that Jesus began to do and teach’ Acts The destiny ‘Theophilus’ , style, and vocabulary of the two books betray a common author.

Roman historian Colin Hemer has provided powerful evidence that Acts was written between AD 60 and This evidence includes these observations:. There is no mention in Acts of the crucial event of the fall of Jerusalem in There is no hint of the outbreak of the Jewish War in 66 or of serious deterioration of relations between Romans and Jews before that time. There is no hint of the deterioration of Christian relations with Rome during the Neronian persecution of the late 60s.

The Dating of the New Testament

The early church father Irenaeus ca. Clement of Alexandria ca. Reinforcing early church tradition are significant internal characteristics of the gospel. While the synoptic gospels Matthew, Mark, Luke identify the Apostle John by name approximately 20 times including parallels , he is not directly mentioned by name in the Gospel of John. Also, through a process of elimination based primarily on analyzing the material in chaps.

Our earliest fragmented manuscript of the New Testament ironically comes from a verse in John’s Gospel dubbed P It’s date varies between – A.D. It.

Date of the Gospel of John was written: AD John wrote Revelation in AD John wrote the Gospel of John in AD Revelation written in AD Flee Jerusalem or be destroyed in AD Rev 5. Rev Rev 6. Rev 1. Rev 7. Rev 2. Rev 8.

Bart Ehrman – Who Wrote The Gospels?